WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
38%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



collyrob 9:37 Wed Nov 4
Pacquiao v Khan
Looks like it's going ahead, April 9th.

Hope pac takes his head off

Replies - In Chronological Order (Show Newest Messages First)

peroni 9:38 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
I'm the opposite - would love Khan to knock him out, lure the fraud Mayweather out of retirement and then do the same to him.

ohstellastellaa 9:40 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
i hate him, but i can see khan beating pacquiao, he just hasn't been any good for a few years now

scott_d 9:48 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
I like Manny, a humble warrior unlike that cunt Mayweather.

Khan has his flaws but he's British so I'll be supporting him.

Pub Bigot 9:49 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
Got to side with my countrymen here.

Mon the Khan!

Johnson 10:12 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
Khan will win this, although I don't want him to.

The Joker 10:15 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
Pub Bigot 9:49 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan

Pancho 10:29 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
Pac vs Woman Beater should while they are both still fighters they are so far past their peak it's silly.

Khan to do him on points but no way will be knock him out.

gank 10:34 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
Strange how you consider (Bolton born) Khan British, yet him and all his family parade Pakistan flags at all his fights.

He's turned his back on GB so I hope Pacquiao gives him brain damage in the ring.

There's a Pacqui joke in there somewhere but I fear I'd be labelled 'racist'.

Pancho 10:37 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
*chuckles and pushes Gank back into the thread*

Fuck it. Take it down.

Private Dancer 10:42 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
Khan seems like a decent enough bloke to me, but then again I don't follow the sport closely. I hope he gets the fight and I hope he beats pac man.

peroni 10:47 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
gank,

He also has his name patterned with the Union Jack on his shorts and highlights his Britishness as much as his Pakistani heritage.

wurzel 10:47 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
British on paper, paki by nature...


His words not mine

Mr. Burns 10:51 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
Pacman vs Pakman

peroni 10:52 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
wurzel

That's totally natural. My kids are growing up in Italy with Italian friends and lifestyle. They're still English and always will be.

Jakarta Jones 10:56 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
Bob Arum adamantly refutes report of Manny Pacquiao-Amir Khan agreement
7h - BOXING
Dan Rafael, ESPN Senior Writer

Top Rank promoter Bob Arum strongly denied a report published Tuesday in England alleging a deal had been made for Manny Pacquiao to face Amir Khan on April 9, likely in Las Vegas, in what is supposed to be Pacquiao's final fight.

According to the report in the Daily Mail, which has published several erroneous stories about Khan, Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather in recent years, "confirmation that Khan has accepted the contract has been sent by his lawyers to Pacquiao's legendary promoter Bob Arum."

The story also quotes Shah Khan, Amir Khan's father, as saying, "Our paperwork went off to Arum on Friday, and every point is covered."

Arum, however, called the report "total bulls---."

"I haven't sent a contract to him. We haven't sent anything to him," Arum told ESPN.com on Tuesday. "Don't you think I'm the promoter of the fight and I would know if I sent a contract? It's total bulls---. It's not true. This is f---ing ridiculous. There is no deal. There is no contract. There has been no decision whatsoever."


Manny Pacquiao, who is recovering from surgery to repair the torn rotator cuff he fought with in his bout May 2, reportedly had a contract to fight Amir Khan, a claim Top Rank promoter Bob Arum denied. Al Bello/Getty Images
According to Arum, the final two candidates for the fight with Pacquiao (57-6-2, 38 KOs), who is coming off surgery to repair the torn rotator cuff that followed his unanimous decision loss to Mayweather in their May 2 welterweight title unification fight (the richest in boxing history), are former unified junior welterweight titleholder Khan, whom Arum does not promote, and 2014 fighter of the year and reigning junior welterweight titleholder Terence Crawford, whom Arum promotes.

Arum said he plans to travel to the Philippines to meet with Pacquiao, who turns 37 in December, and Michael Koncz, his adviser, in the coming weeks to go over details of deals for each opponent.

"Top Rank has sent a contract to neither of them," Arum said. "Top Rank will send a contract to one of them when Manny makes his decision on who he wants to fight. Right now, what we are doing is trying to decide between Crawford and Khan for April 9. But [the reported agreement with Khan] is such bulls---. I don't know what Khan said he signed. Don't I have the right to draw up a contract with either guy? I don't know who Manny wants to fight."

While Arum was on the phone with ESPN.com at the Top Rank building in Las Vegas, he received a call on his cell phone from Cameron Dunkin, Crawford's manager, who had gotten wind of the Daily Mail report. Arum began shouting at Dunkin, "It's not true! It's total bulls---! Tell Crawford it's not true!"

Arum pointed out the Daily Mail's history of inaccurate reporting. He cited stories on a Mayweather-Khan deal being done, the premature reporting of the Mayweather-Pacquiao deal and stories claiming former heavyweight world champion Lennox Lewis was coming out of retirement. Arum said neither the reporter nor anyone at Top Rank called him to check on the report.

Crawford (27-0, 19 KOs), 28, of Omaha, Nebraska, made his case for the fight against Pacquiao in impressive fashion on Oct. 24, when he made his first 140-pound title defense in a one-sided, 10th-round knockout of Dierry Jean.

Khan (31-3, 19 KOs), 28, was twice left behind in bids for fights with Mayweather, who proclaimed him a leading candidate, only to select other opponents. Khan is coming off a competitive decision win against former junior welterweight titlist (and previous Pacquiao victim) Chris Algieri on May 29 in Brooklyn, New York.

Pacquiao, currently a congressman for his province in the Philippines, plans to fight one more time, likely at the MGM Grand, before hitting the campaign trail. He is running for a senate seat, and elections are in May.

gank 10:59 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
Shah Khan? Wasn't that cunt in The Jungle Book?

Eerie Descent 11:06 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
Pacquiao is well past his best, I'd expect Khan to win, but it takes one decent punch to send him bandy, which he has got in his locker. A younger Pac would destroy him.

Khan vs Brook is the fight everyone wants, but Khan is too scared to lose that one. He hasn't fought anyone who can dig since Garcia, it's a shame because I like him, and he has got fantastic hands and is lightening quick, but that chin is made of glass.

, 11:18 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
Khan v Brook is the fight we want to see.

I doubt it would match Froch putting Groves in his place........twice though.

Eggbert Nobacon 11:44 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
a few years ago no contest

but now I think Khan

For someone with a reputation as a big puncher, Manny has not stopped anybody in SIX years and 11 fights

team boaty 12:19 Wed Nov 4
Re: Pacquiao v Khan
Khan is now a fantastic little boxer under Virgil Hunter who has fine tuned him mentally into a well organised rangey puncher who works well behind a solid jab

Doubt his suss chin will be a problem because Pac never has had amazing punch power at these higher weights (don't tell Hatton that) more so that he relies on an accumulation of shots and accuracy to take opponents out

Still lean towards an ageing Pacquiao points win but would not be the massive shock it would of been a few years back if Khan were to get the better of him

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: